The debate around the origin of SARS-CoV-2 virus

  • There are two theories on the origins of virus— the virus could have been accidentally released from a laboratory or it was the result of a spillover from some animal species to humans. 
  • More and more people and countries after countries are refusing to believe in the theory of natural origin of Covid-19.
  • The Director ­General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom  Ghebreyesus, has also acknowledged that more work needs to be done on the lab leak theory.
  • However, a WHO team that visited Wuhan thought a leak to be the least likely hypothesis.  

WHY THE DEBATE RISING AGAIN?

  • WHO’s governing forum, the World Health Assembly, mandated the Director­ General in May 2020 to conduct an inquiry into the origin of SARS­CoV­2.
  • A joint probe was carried out by WHO and China in January-February 2021. 
  • Since there was no conclusive evidence for either hypothesis — natural spillover or lab leak — there were apprehensions when the report leaned in favour of the animal origin hypothesis.
  • The report described the animal origin hypothesis as “likely to very likely”, and stated that a laboratory incident was “extremely unlikely”. 
  • Responding to the report, Dr. Tedros said he did not see the investigation as being extensive enough, and went along with the view that more studies were necessary.
  • China did not give full access to the activities going on inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
BASIS OF NATURAL ORIGIN HYPOTHESIS

  • The Joint WHO­-China study report identified a SARS-related coronavirus in a (horseshoe) bat to which the SARS­CoV­2 virus has 96.2% genomic similarity. 
  • The higher infectivity of SARS­CoV­2 is attributed to peculiarities that it contains in the form of unique insertion of four amino acids in its spike protein that makes it more efficient than the virus causing SARS.
  • Some coronaviruses found in pangolins in China are similar to SARS­CoV­2 in the RBD, showing that the optimised spike protein for efficient binding with human­like ACE2 may have resulted from natural selection.

WHY THE SUSPICION ON WUHAN LAB

  • The researchers have based their theory on two broad counts: the absence of intermediary host and biologically requisite mutations for a bat-housed virus to be infective one to humans, and non-adherence to security protocol for coronavirus research.
  • Wuhan lab is, on the other hand, just 25-30 km from the wet market which China has been insisting as the Covid-19 outbreak zone. 
  • The Wuhan lab has been conducting research on coronavirus including on the family to which Sars-2 is said to be belonging to.
  • The bat species that is said to be the source of Sars-2 is found around 1,500 km from Wuhan, and those flying foxes are not known to go beyond 50 km radius from their habitat. 
  • It is extremely unlikely that Sars-2 travelled 1,500 km without infecting people en route before Wuhan wet market outbreak.
  • Lack of a chain of mutations in the Sars-2, some researchers say, points to a genetically engineered coronavirus produced in a lab. 
  • Unlike previous new pathogens, Sars-2 has appeared ready for human cells without requiring mutation. 
  • Researchers found that Sars-2 found it difficult to adjust back in the bats it is said to have jumped from.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hamas V. PLO

G7 global corporate Tax Deal

The statue of Swami Vivekananda at the JNU campus