Supreme Court central vista judgment

  • The Supreme Court recently gave its nod to the Central Vista redevelopment project in a 2:1 verdict.
  • Case: Rajeev Suri vs Union of India.
  • A Bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the 2-1 judgment, with Justice Khanwilkar and Justice Maheshwari forming the majority. 
  • Justice Khanna pronounced a separate judgment 

WHAT WAS CHALLENGED?

  • A petition was filed in the Supreme Court in April 2020, challenging the Centre’s change-of-land-use notification of March 2020 with regard to the 86 acres of land. 
  • The petitioner, Rajeev Suri, submitted that the order violated the citizen’s Right to Life guaranteed under Article 21 by depriving people of open and green spaces.
  • The court heard the challenge on three main grounds: change of land use; violations of municipal law; and violations of environmental law.

WHAT THE COURT REASONED?

  • In its 2:1 verdict, the court has held that there are no infirmities in the approvals granted. 
  • Justices A M Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari held that the central government’s change of land use for the project in the Master Plan of Delhi 2021 is also a lawful exercise of its powers.
  • It was ruled that the exercise of the Central government under the DDA Act is legal and valid, and the impugned notification stands confirmed. 
  • Also, recommendation by the Environmental Committee was held just and legal.
  • Justice Khanna too agreed with the decision that the project should continue, but said he had a different opinion on the change of land use. 
  • He said that there was no prior approval of heritage conservation committee and thus matter remitted back for public hearing. 

MASTER PLAN

  • Master Plan of Delhi was notified in 2007 to guide the direction of development of the National Capital Territory until 2021. 
  • The central government and the Delhi Development Authority are given the power to modify it.
  • The plan was modified in March 2020 to include the Central Vista project. 
  • Sections of land are assigned for specific purposes such as recreation, government, public and semi-public, which were modified to accommodate the Central Vista project. 
  • The petitioners argued that change in land use was not really a “modification” and also raised concerns on the manner in which the permissions were granted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hamas V. PLO

G7 global corporate Tax Deal

The statue of Swami Vivekananda at the JNU campus